Newsom gave his onetime rival a $380k consulting gig funded by undisclosed donors

In a noteworthy alignment of political and corporate interests, California Governor Gavin Newsom engaged former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa as an advisor on the state’s infrastructure, costing over $380,000 funded largely by undisclosed corporate donors through the nonprofit California Forward. Originally framed as a cost-saving measure, the arrangement has drawn scrutiny regarding its transparency, especially surrounding the financing source, since corporate contributions were not publicly disclosed, raising ethical concerns regarding the handling of behested payments.

Villaraigosa, who netted $35,000 per month for approximately ten months, culminated his role with a series of recommendations that reportedly facilitated the passage of new laws aimed at expediting infrastructure projects statewide. The hiring of Villaraigosa—a former political rival—suggests a strategic move by Newsom to not only tap into Villaraigosa’s expertise but potentially to solidify allyship ahead of the 2026 gubernatorial election, where Villaraigosa is a candidate.

The logistical approach of utilizing California Forward as a funding conduit introduces significant implications for California’s political landscape. Critics, including watchdog groups, argue that this could represent a circumvention of accountability mechanisms meant to keep financial influences transparent in state operations. This arrangement has led to questions about who truly holds sway over infrastructure decisions and whether special interests could unduly influence state policy through indirect funding avenues.

Looking ahead, as California prepares to address a burgeoning infrastructure agenda bolstered by federal funding mechanisms, the ramifications of this situation are likely to prompt calls for stricter compliance with transparency laws regarding private funding. The integrity of governance and the public’s trust in how state projects are brokered may be at stake, making it imperative for the Newsom administration to clarify its dealings and uphold greater scrutiny in future endeavors.

via calmatters.org

Related posts

Feds sue L.A. County sheriff for ‘unreasonable’ delays in issuing concealed gun permits

President Donald Trump vs. Governor Gavin Newsom on Climate Change

How this teen pushed California to change special education policy